Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add DeepSleep feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/10/20 11:02 am, Avri Altman wrote:
> HI,
> 
>> Drivers that wish to support DeepSleep need to set a new capability flag
>> UFSHCD_CAP_DEEPSLEEP and provide a hardware reset via the existing
>>  ->device_reset() callback.
> I would expect that this capability controls sending SSU 4, but it only controls the sysfs entry?

The sysfs entry is the only way to request DeepSleep.

> 
>>
>> It is assumed that UFS devices with wspecversion >= 0x310 support
>> DeepSleep.
>>
>> The UFS specification says to set the IMMED (immediate) flag for the
>> Start/Stop Unit command when entering DeepSleep. However some UFS
>> devices object to that, which is addressed in a subsequent patch.
> After failing to understand what the proper behavior should be with respect of the IMMED bit,
> Although I read the applicable section few time, I gave up and consult our system guy,
> Which is our jedec representative.  This is his answer:
> "...
> In order to avoid uncertainty - the host need to set IMMED bit to '0' (this is explicitly specified by the standard).
> The device responds only after it switches to Pre-DeepSleep state. The host then switch to H8 and this would trigger the device to transition to DeepSleep state.
> ..."
> 
> So maybe the 2nd patch isn't really needed. 

Yes I managed to get it the wrong way around!  I will drop patch 2 and send
V2 of patch 1 in due course.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux