> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:27:42 -0600 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When discussion about TRUE and FALSE came up a long time a go in the > context of the mid layer we agreed to strip the defined constants out of > that code and just go with 1 and 0 inline ... because the code was > pretty much being rewritten. We also decided to encourage but not force > the driver writers simply to use 1 and 0 as well ... a lot of people are > deeply wedded to the TRUE and FALSE defines, it turned out. Given that we now have a standard kernel-wide, c99-friendly way of expressing true and false, I'd suggest that this decision can be revisited. Because a "true" is significantly more meaningful (and hence readable) thing than a bare "1". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
