RE: [PATCH v3 11/13] qla2xxx: Add IOCB resource tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin,
We do not anticipate further changes to this patch or v3 series.

Thanks,
Nilesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quinn Tran <qutran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 10:23 PM
> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>; Nilesh Javali
> <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-
> Storage-Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 11/13] qla2xxx: Add IOCB resource tracking
> 
> 
> On 2020-09-03 21:51, Nilesh Javali wrote:
> > This patch tracks number of IOCB resources used in the IO fast path.
> > If the number of used IOCBs reach a high water limit, driver would
> > return the IO as busy and let upper layer retry. This prevents over
> > subscription of IOCB resources where any future error recovery command
> > is unable to cut through.
> > Enable IOCB throttling by default.
> 
> Please use the block layer reserved tag mechanism instead of adding a
> mechanism that is (a) racy and (b) triggers cache line ping-pong.
> 
> QT: The Block layer reserve tag does fit resource we're tracking.  The reserve
> tag is per command.  The IOCB resource is adapter specific behind  all
> commands.
> 
> QT: I mean " The Block layer reserve tag does NOT fit the resource we're
> tracking"
> 





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux