On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:44 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > /* Vector 0x110 is LINUX_32BIT_SYSCALL_TRAP */
> > > - return pt_regs_trap_type(current_pt_regs()) == 0x110;
> > > + return pt_regs_trap_type(current_pt_regs()) == 0x110 ||
> > > + (current->flags & PF_FORCE_COMPAT);
> >
> > Can't say I like that approach ;-/ Reasoning about the behaviour is much
> > harder when it's controlled like that - witness set_fs() shite...
>
> I don't particularly like it either. But do you have a better idea
> how to deal with io_uring vs compat tasks?
Do we need to worry about something other than the compat_iovec
struct for now? Regarding the code in io_import_iovec(), it would
seem that can easily be handled by exposing an internal helper.
Instead of
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (req->ctx->compat)
return compat_import_iovec(rw, buf, sqe_len, UIO_FASTIOV,
iovec, iter);
#endif
return import_iovec(rw, buf, sqe_len, UIO_FASTIOV, iovec, iter);
This could do
__import_iovec(rw, buf, sqe_len, UIO_FASTIOV, iovec,
iter, req->ctx->compat);
With the normal import_iovec() becoming a trivial wrapper around
the same thing:
ssize_t import_iovec(int type, const struct iovec __user * uvector,
unsigned nr_segs, unsigned fast_segs,
struct iovec **iov, struct iov_iter *i)
{
return __import_iovec(type, uvector, nr_segs, fast_segs, iov,
i, in_compat_syscall());
}
Arnd
