Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: Cleanup scsi_noretry_cmd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-09-10 00:39, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> No need for else after return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 927b1e641842..5f3726abed78 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -1755,8 +1755,8 @@ int scsi_noretry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>  	if (scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV ||
>  	    blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request))
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }

Is this patch useful? Is it necessary? Or is it just code churn?

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux