Re: [PATCH] zfcp: Invalid locking order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:17:57PM +0100, Swen Schillig wrote:
> From: Swen Schillig <swen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Invalid locking order. Kernel hangs after trying to take two locks
> which are dependend on each other. Introducing temporary variable
> to free requests. Free lock after requests are copied.
>     

I am just curious. You didn't mention which locks are causing the dead
lock.

I've glanced through the code and it seems that locking order
of abort_lock and req_list_lock for adapters is inconsistent.
Is that the bug you try to fix?


Regards,

Andreas



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux