Hi Arun, On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:47:48PM -0700, Arun Easi wrote: > Could you drop the above comment about firmware, as it is speculation at > this point? Sure, no problem. > It'd be best to take a chip reset path, rather than assuming the > packet is good and having the appropriate handler called (hacky). > An approach similar to the one done at the beginning of > qla2x00_get_sp_from_handle() is what I had in mind. Ok, agreed a reset is probably the safest choice. > I'd have preferred a common approach across the different IOCB types > as an attempt to harden the code, but that will be a little more > involved work. This looks ok. Yes, I was pondering on it but I don't know enough to really come up with something reasonable. Currently our customers report only this hickup. So this is really only a partial workaround. Thanks, Daniel
