Re: [PATCH 10/28] MIPS/jazzdma: decouple from dma-direct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 08:55:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The jazzdma ops implement support for a very basic IOMMU.  Thus we really
> should not use the dma-direct code that takes physical address limits
> into account.  This survived through the great MIPS DMA ops cleanup mostly
> because I was lazy, but now it is time to fully split the implementations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/jazz/jazzdma.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux