On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:19:05AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:24:28AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > None of the complicated overlapping regions bits of the kobj_map are > > required for the character device lookup, so just a trivial xarray > > instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Really? This is ok to use and just as fast? If so, wonderful, it would > be great to clean up kobj_map users. Xarrays provide pretty efficient as long as we have a unsigned long or smaller index (check, dev_t is small) and the indices are reasonable clustered (check, minors for the same major). Memory usage will go down vs the probes, and lookup speed up. > > + mutex_lock(&chrdevs_lock); > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + error = xa_insert(&cdev_map, dev + i, p, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (error) > > + goto out_unwind; > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&chrdevs_lock); > > > > kobject_get(p->kobj.parent); > > Can't you drop this kobject_get() too? I'll have to drop it or add back the put on the delete side. And I think the latter is safer for now, because.. > > And also the "struct kobj" in struct cdev can be gone as well, as the > kobj_map was the only "real" user of this structure. I know some > drivers liked to touch that field as well, but it never actually did > anything for them, so it was pointless, but it will take some 'make > allmodconfig' builds to flush them out. I looked at it, but it does get registered and shows up in sysfs. I don't really dare to touch this for now, as it can have huge implications. Better done in a separate series (if we can actually do it at all).