Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Remove an unpaired ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests() in err_handler()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-18 13:42, Asutosh Das wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17 2020 at 22:21 -0700, Can Guo wrote:
Commit 5586dd8ea250a ("scsi: ufs: Fix a race condition between error
handler and runtime PM ops") moves the ufshcd_scsi_block_requests() inside err_handler(), but forgets to remove the ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests() in
the early return path. Correct the coding mistake.

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 2b55c2e..b8441ad 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5670,7 +5670,6 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct *work)
		if (hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_ERROR)
			hba->ufshcd_state = UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL;
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-		ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
		return;
	}
	ufshcd_set_eh_in_progress(hba);
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.


Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su<hongwus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux