RE: [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters to MQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Hi Ming -
> >
> > There is still some race which is not handled.  Take a case of IO is
> > not able to get budget and it has already marked <restarts> flag.
> > <restarts> flag will be seen non-zero in completion path and
> > completion path will attempt h/w queue run. (But this particular IO is
> > still not in s/w queue.).
> > Attempt of running h/w queue from completion path will not flush any
> > IO since there is no IO in s/w queue.
>
> Then where is the IO to be submitted in case of running out of budget?

Typical race in your latest patch is - (Lets consider command A,B and C)
Command A did not receive budget. Command B completed  (which was already
submitted earlier) at the same time and it make sdev->device_busy = 0 from
" scsi_finish_command".
Command B has still not called "scsi_end_request". Command C get the
budget and it will make sdev->device_busy = 1. Now, Command A set  set
sdev->restarts flags but will not run h/w queue since sdev->device_busy =
1.
Command B run h/w queue (make sdev->restart = 0) from completion path, but
command -A is still not in the s/w queue. Command-A is in now in s/w
queue. Command-C completed but it will not run h/w queue because
sdev->restarts = 0.


>
> Any IO request which is going to be added to hctx->dispatch, the queue
will be
> re-run via blk-mq core.
>
> Any IO request being issued directly when running out of budget will be
insert
> to hctx->dispatch or sw/scheduler queue, will be run in the submission
path.

I have *not* included below changes we discussed in my testing - If I
include below patch, it is correct that queue will be run in submission
path (at least the path which is impacted in my testing). You have already
mentioned that most of the submission path has fix now in latest kernel
w.r.t running h/w queue from submission path.  Below path is missing for
running h/w queue from submission path.

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c index
54f9015..bcfd33a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -173,8 +173,10 @@ static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct
blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
                if (!sbitmap_any_bit_set(&hctx->ctx_map))
                        break;

-               if (!blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(hctx))
+               if (!blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(hctx)) {
+                       blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx,
+ BLK_MQ_BUDGET_DELAY);
                        break;
+               }

                rq = blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx(hctx, ctx);
                if (!rq) {

Are you saying above fix should be included along with your latest patch ?

>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux