On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:17:24PM +0900, SEO HOYOUNG wrote: > To support the fuction of writebooster by vendor. > The WB behavior that the vendor wants is slightly different. > But we have to support it And why would we give a f*%k what the so called vendor (of what anyway) wants? Either the policy makes sense and we should adopt it, or it depends on device parameters and we need to take them into account. But these stupid overrides don't make any sense at all. Even less than all the other ufs crap.
