>
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 20:21 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 2020-07-06 06:22, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > > +static void ufshcd_cleanup_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + if (sdev->request_queue)
> > > + blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > > +}
> >
> > No SCSI LLD should ever call blk_cleanup_queue() directly for
> > sdev->request_queue. Only the SCSI core should call blk_cleanup_queue()
> > directly for that queue.
>
> Got it.
>
> So may I focus on fixing racing first by quiecsing all SCSI devices only
> and do not touch blk_cleanup_queue() in UFS driver, just like v2?
>
>
> > > int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > {
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > + struct scsi_target *starget;
> > >
> > > if (!hba->is_powered)
> > > goto out;
> > > @@ -8612,7 +8632,25 @@ int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Quiesce all SCSI devices to prevent any non-PM requests sending
> > > + * from block layer during and after shutdown.
> > > + *
> > > + * Here we can not use blk_cleanup_queue() since PM requests
> > > + * (with BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag) are still required to be sent
> > > + * through block layer. Therefore SCSI command queued after the
> > > + * scsi_target_quiesce() call returned will block until
> > > + * blk_cleanup_queue() is called.
> > > + *
> > > + * Besides, scsi_target_"un"quiesce (e.g., scsi_target_resume) can
> > > + * be ignored since shutdown is one-way flow.
> > > + */
> > > + ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(ufshcd_quiece_sdev);
> > > +
> > > ret = ufshcd_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
> > > +
> > > + /* Set queue as dying to not block queueing commands */
> > > + ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(ufshcd_cleanup_queue);
> > > out:
> > > if (ret)
> > > dev_err(hba->dev, "%s failed, err %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > >
> >
> > What is the purpose of ufshcd_shutdown()? Why does this function exist?
> > How about removing the calls to ufshcd_shutdown() and invoking power
> down
> > code from inside sd_suspend_common() instead?
>
> ufshcd_shutdown() configures below things different from or more than
> what sd_suspend_common() can do now,
>
> - Set link as OFF state
> - Regulator and clock toggling according to required low-power state for
> shutdown
> - Auto BKOP toggling
> - Vendor-specific shutdown flow ...etc.
>
> Therefore UFS shutdown callback would be still required.
And this is also why, that each chipset vendor implement its own dev_pm_ops.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
> Stanley Chu
