Re: [PATCH] lpfc: nvme remote port devloss_tmo from lldd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:14:12 -0700, James Smart wrote:

> Nvme-fc allows the driver to specify a default devloss_tmo value when
> registering the remote port. The lpfc driver is currently not doing so
> although it is implementing a driver internal node loss value of 30s
> which also is used on the scsi fc remote port. As no devloss_tmo is set,
> the nvme-fc transport defaults to 60s. So there's competing timers.
> 
> Additionally, due to the competing timers, its possible the nvme rport
> is removed but the scsi rport remains. Its possible that the scsi fc
> rport, which was registered for the nvme port even if it doesn't utilize
> the scsi protocol, had been tuned to not match either the 60s (nvme-fc
> default) or 30s (lldd default), it gets out of whack. The lldd will
> defer to the scsi fc rport as long as the scsi fc rport has not had its
> devloss_tmo expire.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 5.9/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: lpfc: NVMe remote port devloss_tmo from lldd
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/1f5468231476

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux