RE: [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 2/3] ufs: exynos: introduce command history

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +         EXYNOS specific, such as vendor specific hardware contexts.
> > +
> > +         Select this if you want to get and print the information.
> > +         If unsure, say N.
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile
> > index f0c5b95..d9e4da7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PCI) += tc-dwc-g210-pci.o
> > ufshcd-dwc.o tc-dwc-g210.
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PLATFORM) += tc-dwc-g210-pltfrm.o
> > ufshcd-dwc.o tc-dwc-g210.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CDNS_PLATFORM) += cdns-pltfrm.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM) += ufs-qcom.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS) += ufs-exynos.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS) += ufs-exynos.o ufs-exynos-dbg.o
> If the key functionality depends on SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS_CMD_LOG, Why not use
> it for make as well, and in your header as well? 
I assume somebody including me will add dumping vendor register or another item 
in the file. That's why I did.
But currently, you're right and I will do.

Thanks.
Kiwoong Kim





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux