Re: [PATCH] scsi: virtio_scsi: remove unnecessary condition check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/07/20 17:06, Xianting Tian wrote:
> kmem_cache_destroy and mempool_destroy can correctly handle
> null pointer parameter, so there is no need to check if the
> parameter is null before calling kmem_cache_destroy and
> mempool_destroy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index bfec84a..54ac83e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -1003,14 +1003,10 @@ static int __init init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  error:
> -	if (virtscsi_cmd_pool) {
> -		mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> -		virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
> -	}
> -	if (virtscsi_cmd_cache) {
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> -		virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
> -	}
> +	mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> +	virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
> +	kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> +	virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux