RE: [RFC PATCH v1] ufs: introduce async ufs interface initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> 
> When you set uic_link_state during sleep statae to
> UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE, UFS driver does interface initialization
> that is a series of some steps including fDeviceInit and thus,
> You might feel that its latency is a little bit longer.
> 
> This patch is run it asynchronously to reduce system wake-up time.
Can you share your initial testing findings?
How much time does it save?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig  |  10 ++++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> ---
>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> index 8cd9026..723e7cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> @@ -172,3 +172,13 @@ config SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS
> 
>           Select this if you have UFS host controller on EXYNOS chipset.
>           If unsure, say N.
> +
> +config SCSI_UFSHCD_ASYNC_INIT
> +       bool "Asynchronous UFS interface initialization support"
> +       depends on SCSI_UFSHCD
> +       default n
> +       ---help---
> +       This selects the support of doing UFS interface initialization
> +       asynchronously when you set link state to link off,
> +       i.e. UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE, to reduce system wake-up time.
> +       Select this if you have UFS Host Controller.
Maybe replace this config switch with platform capability?
So each platform vendor can choose if he is using a sync vs async init?

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 52abe82..b65d38c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8319,6 +8319,80 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static int ufshcd_post_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
Why do you need to move this code around?
If its async - then there is no shared code - 
you go through the full init flow, and just goto out?

> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
> +               ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (ufshcd_keep_autobkops_enabled_except_suspend(hba))
> +               ufshcd_enable_auto_bkops(hba);
> +       else
> +               /*
> +                * If BKOPs operations are urgently needed at this moment then
> +                * keep auto-bkops enabled or else disable it.
> +                */
> +               ufshcd_urgent_bkops(hba);
> +
> +       hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false;
> +
> +       if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed)
> +               ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(hba);
> +
> +       /* Enable Auto-Hibernate if configured */
> +       ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(hba);
> +
> +       if (hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> +               hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
> +               cancel_delayed_work(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Schedule clock gating in case of no access to UFS device yet */
> +       ufshcd_release(hba);
> +out:
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#if defined(SCSI_UFSHCD_ASYNC_INIT)
> +static void ufshcd_async_resume(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> +{
> +       struct ufs_hba *hba = (struct ufs_hba *)data;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +       int retries = 2;
> +
> +       /* transition to block requests */
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +       hba->ufshcd_state = UFSHCD_STATE_RESET;
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +
> +       /* initialize, instead of set_old_link_state ?? */
> +       do {
> +               ret = ufshcd_reset_and_restore(hba);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: reset and restore failed\n",
> +                                       __func__);
> +                       spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +                       hba->ufshcd_state = UFSHCD_STATE_ERROR;
> +                       hba->pm_op_in_progress = 0;
> +                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +                       return;
> +               }
> +               ret = ufshcd_post_resume(hba);
> +       } while (ret && --retries);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto reset;
> +
> +       hba->pm_op_in_progress = 0;
> +       if (ret)
> +               ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.resume_err, (u32)ret);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * ufshcd_resume - helper function for resume operations
>   * @hba: per adapter instance
> @@ -8370,6 +8444,14 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>                  * A full initialization of the host and the device is
>                  * required since the link was put to off during suspend.
>                  */
> +#if defined(SCSI_UFSHCD_ASYNC_INIT)
> +               /*
> +                * Assuems error free since ufshcd_probe_hba failure is
> +                * uncorrectable.
> +                */
> +               ufshcd_async_schedule(ufshcd_async_resume, hba);
> +               goto out_new;
> +#else
>                 ret = ufshcd_reset_and_restore(hba);
>                 /*
>                  * ufshcd_reset_and_restore() should have already
> @@ -8377,38 +8459,12 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>                  */
>                 if (ret || !ufshcd_is_link_active(hba))
>                         goto vendor_suspend;
> +#endif
>         }
> 
> -       if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
> -               ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       goto set_old_link_state;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (ufshcd_keep_autobkops_enabled_except_suspend(hba))
> -               ufshcd_enable_auto_bkops(hba);
> -       else
> -               /*
> -                * If BKOPs operations are urgently needed at this moment then
> -                * keep auto-bkops enabled or else disable it.
> -                */
> -               ufshcd_urgent_bkops(hba);
> -
> -       hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false;
> -
> -       if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed)
> -               ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(hba);
> -
> -       /* Enable Auto-Hibernate if configured */
> -       ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(hba);
> -
> -       if (hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> -               hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
> -               cancel_delayed_work(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> -       }
> -
> -       /* Schedule clock gating in case of no access to UFS device yet */
> -       ufshcd_release(hba);
> +       ret = ufshcd_post_resume(hba);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto set_old_link_state;
> 
>         goto out;
> 
> @@ -8427,6 +8483,10 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>         hba->pm_op_in_progress = 0;
>         if (ret)
>                 ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.resume_err, (u32)ret);
> +       /* For async init, pm_op_in_progress still needs to be one */
> +#if defined(SCSI_UFSHCD_ASYNC_INIT)
> +out_new:
> +#endif
>         return ret;
>  }

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> --
> 2.7.4





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux