Hi Kiwoong, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next] [also build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next v5.8-rc3 next-20200702] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kiwoong-Kim/ufs-support-various-values-per-device/20200702-102146 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next config: sparc64-randconfig-s032-20200701 (attached as .config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # apt-get install sparse # sparse version: v0.6.2-3-gfa153962-dirty # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=sparc64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:211:13: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:6978:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different modifiers) @@ expected struct ufs_dev_value *value @@ got struct ufs_dev_value const * @@ >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:6978:36: sparse: expected struct ufs_dev_value *value >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:6978:36: sparse: got struct ufs_dev_value const * vim +211 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c 209 210 static const struct ufs_dev_value ufs_dev_values[] = { > 211 {0, 0, 0, 0, false}, 212 }; 213 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
