Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+static int hctx_tags_shared_sbitmap_bitmap_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
+{
+    struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
+    struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
+    struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
+    struct sbitmap shared_sb, *sb;
+    int res;
+
+    if (!set)
+        return 0;
+
+    /*
+     * We could use the allocated sbitmap for that hctx here, but
+     * that would mean that we would need to clean it prior to use.
+     */

*

+    res = sbitmap_init_node(&shared_sb,
+                set->__bitmap_tags.sb.depth,
+                set->__bitmap_tags.sb.shift,
+                GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+    if (res)
+        return res;
+    sb = &shared_sb;
+
+    res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&q->sysfs_lock);
+    if (res)
+        goto out;
+    if (hctx->tags) {
+        hctx_filter_sb(sb, hctx);
+        sbitmap_bitmap_show(sb, m);
+    }
+
+    mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
+
+out:
+    sbitmap_free(&shared_sb);
+    return res;
+}
+
  static int hctx_tags_bitmap_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
  {
      struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
@@ -823,6 +884,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_shared_sbitmap_attrs
      {"busy", 0400, hctx_busy_show},
      {"ctx_map", 0400, hctx_ctx_map_show},
      {"tags", 0400, hctx_tags_show},
+    {"tags_bitmap", 0400, hctx_tags_shared_sbitmap_bitmap_show},
      {"sched_tags", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_show},
      {"sched_tags_bitmap", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_bitmap_show},
      {"io_poll", 0600, hctx_io_poll_show, hctx_io_poll_write},

Ah, right. Here it is.

But I don't get it; why do we have to allocate a temporary bitmap and can't walk the existing shared sbitmap?

For the bitmap dump - sbitmap_bitmap_show() - it is passed a struct sbitmap *. So we have to filter into a temp per-hctx struct sbitmap. We could change sbitmap_bitmap_show() to accept a filter iterator - which I think you're getting at - but I am not sure it's worth the change. Or else use the allocated sbitmap for the hctx, as above*, but I may be remove that (see 4/12 response).

Cheers,
John



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux