Re: [PATCH] iscsi: Fix deadlock on recovery path during GFP_IO reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/7/20 10:59 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted via
> the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
> rx_queue_mutex, if that allocation causes a memory reclaim that
> writebacks to a failed iscsi device.  Then, the recovery procedure can
> never make progress to recover the failed disk or abort outstanding IO
> operations to complete the reclaim (since rx_queue_mutex is locked),
> thus locking the system.
> 
> Nevertheless, just marking all allocations under rx_queue_mutex as
> GFP_NOIO (or locking the userspace process with something like
> PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) is not enough, since the iscsi command code relies on
> other subsystems that try to grab locked mutexes, whose threads are
> GFP_IO, leading to the same deadlock. One instance where this situation
> can be observed is in the backtraces below, stitched from multiple bugs
> reports, involving the kobj uevent sent when a session is created.
> 
> The root of the problem is not the fact that iscsi does GFP_IO
> allocations, that is acceptable. The actual problem is that
> rx_queue_mutex has a very large granularity, covering every unrelated
> netlink command execution at the same time as the error recovery path.
> 
> The proposed fix leverages the recently added mechanism to stop failed
> connections from the kernel, by enabling it to execute even though a
> management command from the netlink socket is being run (rx_queue_mutex
> is held), provided that the command is known to be safe.  It splits the
> rx_queue_mutex in two mutexes, one protecting from concurrent command
> execution from the netlink socket, and one protecting stop_conn from
> racing with other connection management operations that might conflict
> with it.
> 
> It is not very pretty, but it is the simplest way to resolve the
> deadlock.  I considered making it a lock per connection, but some
> external mutex would still be needed to deal with iscsi_if_destroy_conn.
> 
> The patch was tested by forcing a memory shrinker (unrelated, but used
> bufio/dm-verity) to reclaim ISCSI pages every time
> ISCSI_UEVENT_CREATE_SESSION happens, which is reasonable to simulate
> reclaims that might happen with GFP_KERNEL on that path.  Then, a faulty
> hung target causes a connection to fail during intensive IO, at the same
> time a new session is added by iscsid.
> 
> The following stacktraces are stiches from several bug reports, showing
> a case where the deadlock can happen.
> 
>  iSCSI-write
>          holding: rx_queue_mutex
>          waiting: uevent_sock_mutex
> 
>          kobject_uevent_env+0x1bd/0x419
>          kobject_uevent+0xb/0xd
>          device_add+0x48a/0x678
>          scsi_add_host_with_dma+0xc5/0x22d
>          iscsi_host_add+0x53/0x55
>          iscsi_sw_tcp_session_create+0xa6/0x129
>          iscsi_if_rx+0x100/0x1247
>          netlink_unicast+0x213/0x4f0
>          netlink_sendmsg+0x230/0x3c0
> 
>  iscsi_fail iscsi_conn_failure
>          waiting: rx_queue_mutex
> 
>          schedule_preempt_disabled+0x325/0x734
>          __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x18b/0x230
>          mutex_lock+0x22/0x40
>          iscsi_conn_failure+0x42/0x149
>          worker_thread+0x24a/0xbc0
> 
>  EventManager_
>          holding: uevent_sock_mutex
>          waiting: dm_bufio_client->lock
> 
>          dm_bufio_lock+0xe/0x10
>          shrink+0x34/0xf7
>          shrink_slab+0x177/0x5d0
>          do_try_to_free_pages+0x129/0x470
>          try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0x14f/0x210
>          memcg_kmem_newpage_charge+0xa6d/0x13b0
>          __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4a3/0x1a70
>          fallback_alloc+0x1b2/0x36c
>          __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xb9/0x10d0
>          __alloc_skb+0x83/0x2f0
>          kobject_uevent_env+0x26b/0x419
>          dm_kobject_uevent+0x70/0x79
>          dev_suspend+0x1a9/0x1e7
>          ctl_ioctl+0x3e9/0x411
>          dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x17
>          do_vfs_ioctl+0xb3/0x460
>          SyS_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> 
>  MemcgReclaimerD"
>          holding: dm_bufio_client->lock
>          waiting: stuck io to finish (needs iscsi_fail thread to progress)
> 
>          schedule at ffffffffbd603618
>          io_schedule at ffffffffbd603ba4
>          do_io_schedule at ffffffffbdaf0d94
>          __wait_on_bit at ffffffffbd6008a6
>          out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffffbd600960
>          wait_on_bit.constprop.10 at ffffffffbdaf0f17
>          __make_buffer_clean at ffffffffbdaf18ba
>          __cleanup_old_buffer at ffffffffbdaf192f
>          shrink at ffffffffbdaf19fd
>          do_shrink_slab at ffffffffbd6ec000
>          shrink_slab at ffffffffbd6ec24a
>          do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffffbd6eda09
>          try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages at ffffffffbd6ede7e
>          mem_cgroup_resize_limit at ffffffffbd7024c0
>          mem_cgroup_write at ffffffffbd703149
>          cgroup_file_write at ffffffffbd6d9c6e
>          sys_write at ffffffffbd6662ea
>          system_call_fastpath at ffffffffbdbc34a2
> 
> Reported-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> index 17a45716a0fe..d99c17306dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> @@ -1616,6 +1616,12 @@ static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(iscsi_connection_class,
>  static struct sock *nls;
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(rx_queue_mutex);
>  
> +/*
> + * conn_mutex protects the {start,bind,stop,destroy}_conn from racing
> + * against the kernel stop_connection recovery mechanism
> + */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(conn_mutex);
> +
>  static LIST_HEAD(sesslist);
>  static LIST_HEAD(sessdestroylist);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sesslock);
> @@ -2442,6 +2448,32 @@ int iscsi_offload_mesg(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_offload_mesg);
>  
> +/*
> + * This can be called without the rx_queue_mutex, if invoked by the kernel
> + * stop work. But, in that case, it is guaranteed not to race with
> + * iscsi_destroy by conn_mutex.
> + */
> +static void iscsi_if_stop_conn(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, int flag)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * It is important that this path doesn't rely on
> +	 * rx_queue_mutex, otherwise, a thread doing allocation on a
> +	 * start_session/start_connection could sleep waiting on a
> +	 * writeback to a failed iscsi device, that cannot be recovered
> +	 * because the lock is held.  If we don't hold it here, the
> +	 * kernel stop_conn_work_fn has a chance to stop the broken
> +	 * session and resolve the allocation.
> +	 *
> +	 * Still, the user invoked .stop_conn() needs to be serialized
> +	 * with stop_conn_work_fn by a private mutex.  Not pretty, but
> +	 * it works.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
> +	conn->transport->stop_conn(conn, flag);
> +	mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
> +
> +}
> +
>  static void stop_conn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, *tmp;
> @@ -2460,30 +2492,17 @@ static void stop_conn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  		uint32_t sid = iscsi_conn_get_sid(conn);
>  		struct iscsi_cls_session *session;
>  
> -		mutex_lock(&rx_queue_mutex);
> -
>  		session = iscsi_session_lookup(sid);
>  		if (session) {
>  			if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>  				session->recovery_tmo = 0;
> -				conn->transport->stop_conn(conn,
> -							   STOP_CONN_TERM);
> +				iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, STOP_CONN_TERM);
>  			} else {
> -				conn->transport->stop_conn(conn,
> -							   STOP_CONN_RECOVER);
> +				iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, STOP_CONN_RECOVER);
>  			}
>  		}
>  
>  		list_del_init(&conn->conn_list_err);
> -
> -		mutex_unlock(&rx_queue_mutex);
> -
> -		/* we don't want to hold rx_queue_mutex for too long,
> -		 * for instance if many conns failed at the same time,
> -		 * since this stall other iscsi maintenance operations.
> -		 * Give other users a chance to proceed.
> -		 */
> -		cond_resched();
>  	}
>  }

I'm curious about why you removed the cond_resched() here. Is it because
it is no longer needed, with shorter (mutex) waiting time?

>  
> @@ -2843,8 +2862,11 @@ iscsi_if_destroy_conn(struct iscsi_transport *transport, struct iscsi_uevent *ev
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&connlock, flags);
>  
>  	ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "Destroying transport conn\n");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
>  	if (transport->destroy_conn)
>  		transport->destroy_conn(conn);
> +	mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3686,9 +3708,12 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> +		mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
>  		ev->r.retcode =	transport->bind_conn(session, conn,
>  						ev->u.b_conn.transport_eph,
>  						ev->u.b_conn.is_leading);
> +		mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
> +
>  		if (ev->r.retcode || !transport->ep_connect)
>  			break;
>  
> @@ -3709,25 +3734,31 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
>  		break;
>  	case ISCSI_UEVENT_START_CONN:
>  		conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.start_conn.sid, ev->u.start_conn.cid);
> -		if (conn)
> +		if (conn) {
> +			mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
>  			ev->r.retcode = transport->start_conn(conn);
> +			mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
> +		}
>  		else
>  			err = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	case ISCSI_UEVENT_STOP_CONN:
>  		conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.stop_conn.sid, ev->u.stop_conn.cid);
>  		if (conn)
> -			transport->stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
> +			iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
>  		else
>  			err = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	case ISCSI_UEVENT_SEND_PDU:
>  		conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.send_pdu.sid, ev->u.send_pdu.cid);
> -		if (conn)
> +		if (conn) {
> +			mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
>  			ev->r.retcode =	transport->send_pdu(conn,
>  				(struct iscsi_hdr*)((char*)ev + sizeof(*ev)),
>  				(char*)ev + sizeof(*ev) + ev->u.send_pdu.hdr_size,
>  				ev->u.send_pdu.data_size);
> +			mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
> +		}
>  		else
>  			err = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
> 

My question above is for my own information, so I'll still say:

Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@xxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux