Re: [PATCH 12/15] target: add sysfs session helper functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/11/20 22:16, Mike Christie wrote:
On 5/11/20 2:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2020-05-11 11:39, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
On 05/10/20 23:57, Mike Christie wrote:
This patch adds helpers to add/remove a dir per session. There is only 2
files/dirs initially.


...

+
+int target_sysfs_add_session(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg,
+                 struct se_session *se_sess)
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    /*
+     * Copy ACL name so we don't have to worry about mixing configfs
+     * and sysfs refcounts.
+     */
+    if (!se_sess->se_node_acl->dynamic_node_acl) {
+        se_sess->acl_name = kstrdup(se_sess->se_node_acl->initiatorname,
+                        GFP_KERNEL);
+        if (!se_sess->acl_name)
+            return -ENOMEM;
+    }
+
+    ret = kobject_add(&se_sess->kobj, se_tpg->sessions_kobj, "%s-%d",
+              se_sess->tpt_id->name, se_sess->sid);
+    if (ret) {
+        pr_err("Could not add session%d to sysfs. Error %d.\n",
+               se_sess->sid, ret);
+        goto free_acl_name;
+    }
+
+    ret = add_transport_id_attrs(se_sess);
+    if (ret)
+        goto del_kobj;
+
+    if (se_sess->tfo->session_attrs) {
+        ret = sysfs_create_group(&se_sess->kobj,
+                     se_sess->tfo->session_attrs);
+        if (ret)
+            goto rm_tpt_id_grps;
+    }
+
+    ret = sysfs_create_link(tcm_core_sessions_kobj, &se_sess->kobj,
+                se_sess->kobj.name);

I would prefer to have links named "session-%d" or "%d" only, of course
with se_sess->sid as the value for '%d'.

Yeah for the part of your comment that got chopped I can see your point.
For the dynamic acl case (userspace did not create an ACL so the kernel
made a tmp one), then doing session-$id will be easier for userspace to
lookup a specific session since it does not know the initiator name and
only knows the session id.

Yes, I meant, that "session-%d" or even "%d" only would be fine for the
links in scsi_target/sessions. When looking for a session if session-id
is known only, then this is easy to use.

Regarding the session folders in the tpgt_X folder, I think the "%s-%d"
format with acl or initiator name followed by the session-id would be
fine for both cases, with acl and with dynamic acl. Again the above
links can be used for dynamic acl lookup.



Isn't se_sess->sid a property that is filled in by the iSCSI target
driver only? Is se_sess->sid zero for all other target drivers than the
iSCSI target driver?

No, in this patch in transport_alloc_session() I added a common sid
allocator so all sessions have a unique id across all targets.


If userspace knows the session-id only, such names make it easier to
find the corresponding link.

Personally I prefer the %s-%d naming scheme. I think that naming scheme
has the following advantages:
1. No need to run cat ... to retrieve the initiator name.
2. It becomes possible to derive from the 'ls' output which initiators
created multiple sessions.
3. All sessions created by the same initiator appear consecutively.


Ccing Hannes, because he was also saying that we should use generic
names like target-%X, session-$d, etc. If we change all the code to use
generic names for the target/fabric/tpgt/session, then examples like #2
or similar ones like using tree to see the topology from a SCSI'ish view
would not work.

In the end, we have this issue with SCSI on the initiator side, and it's
a pain, but not a show stopper.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux