RE: [PATCH v6 04/10] scsi: ufs: introduce UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN quirk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Christoph,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 22 April 2020 12:24
> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh@xxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> krzk@xxxxxxxxxx; avri.altman@xxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> kwmad.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] scsi: ufs: introduce
> UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN quirk
> 
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:29:38PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> > Some UFS host controllers may think granularities of PRDT length and
> > offset as bytes, not double words.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  6 ++++++
> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index ee30ed6cc805..b32fcedcdcb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> >  		return sg_segments;
> >
> >  	if (sg_segments) {
> > -		lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> > -			cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments);
> > +
> > +		if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN)
> > +			lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> > +				cpu_to_le16((u16)(sg_segments *
> > +					sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry)));
> > +		else
> > +			lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> > +				cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments));
> 
> No double words here.  "Normal" UFS uses the actual segment count, while
> Samsumg uses bytes.  Also no need fo the u16 count in either the old or
new
> version.
Ok, will update the commit message and take your suggestion in the next
version. 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux