Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iscsi-target: fix login error when receiving is too fast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/24/20 12:01 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 4/24/20 7:35 AM, Hou Pu wrote:
>> iscsi_target_sk_data_ready() could be invoked indirectly
>> by iscsi_target_do_login_rx() from workqueue like following:
>>
>> iscsi_target_do_login_rx()
>>   iscsi_target_do_login()
>>     iscsi_target_do_tx_login_io()
>>       iscsit_put_login_tx()
>>         iscsi_login_tx_data()
>>           tx_data()
>>             sock_sendmsg_nosec()
>>               tcp_sendmsg()
>>                 release_sock()
>>                   sk_backlog_rcv()
>>                     tcp_v4_do_rcv()
>>                       tcp_data_ready()
>>                         iscsi_target_sk_data_ready()
>>
>> At that time LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE is not cleared.
>> and iscsi_target_sk_data_ready will not read data
>> from the socket. And some iscsi initiator(i.e. libiscsi)
>> will wait forever for a reply.
>>
>> LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE should be cleared early just after
>> doing the receive and before writing to the socket in
>> iscsi_target_do_login_rx.
>>
>> But sad news is that LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE is also used
>> by sk_state_change to do login cleanup if a socket was closed
>> at login time. It is supposed to be cleared after the login
>> pdu is successfully processed and replied.
>>
>> So introduce another flag LOGIN_FLAGS_WRITE_ACTIVE to cover
>> the transmit part so that sk_state_change could work well
>> and clear LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE early so that sk_data_ready
>> could also work.
>>
>> While at here, use login_flags more efficient.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hou Pu <houpu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  include/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_core.h |  9 +++++----
>>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
>> index 685d771b51d4..4cfa742e61df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
>> @@ -622,6 +622,26 @@ static void iscsi_target_do_login_rx(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	if (rc < 0)
>>  		goto err;
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE is cleared so that sk_data_ready
>> +	 * could be trigger again after this.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * LOGIN_FLAGS_WRITE_ACTIVE is cleared after we successfully
>> +	 * process a login pdu, so that sk_state_chage could do login
>> +	 * cleanup as needed if the socket is closed. If a delayed work is
>> +	 * ongoing (LOGIN_FLAGS_WRITE_ACTIVE or LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE),
>> +	 * sk_state_change will leave the cleanup to the delayed work or
>> +	 * it will schedule a delayed work to do cleanup.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (conn->sock) {
>> +		struct sock *sk = conn->sock->sk;
>> +
>> +		write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>> +		clear_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags);
>> +		set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_WRITE_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags);
>> +		write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>> +	}
>> +
> Hey,
> 
> I had one more question.
> 
> With the above code, I think we have a race where if we clear the bit
> above early and iscsi_target_sk_data_ready runs while
> iscsi_target_do_login_rx is still running then we could queue the work
> an extra time and get stuck. Because the bit is now not set, if
> iscsi_target_sk_data_ready runs it will end up calling
> schedule_delayed_work which will queue up the work again since the work
> is running and not pending.
> 
> If that is correct and we hit the race what happens if this was the last
> login pdu, and we are supposed to go to full feature phase next? For
> example if iscsi_target_do_login_rx runs an extra time, will we end up
> stuck waiting in iscsi_target_do_login_rx's call to:
> 
> rc = conn->conn_transport->iscsit_get_login_rx(conn, login);
> 
> ?

Just answering my own question. It looks like we do not get stuck. But
we either get nothing on the session so the login timeout fires and we
drop the session. Or, we get a PDU and the login thread reads it in
before the normal rx thread does, but it assumes it is a login related
and we most likely drop the session due to invalid fields.

I think in iscsi_target_restore_sock_callbacks we want to do a:

cancel_delayed_work(&conn->login_work)

after we reset the callbacks and drop the sk_callback_lock lock.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux