From: Murthy Bhat <Murthy.Bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit b969261134c1b990b96ea98fe5e0fcf8ec937c04 ] Use sas_phy_delete rather than sas_phy_free which, according to comments, should not be called for PHYs that have been set up successfully. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/157048748876.11757.17773443136670011786.stgit@brunhilda Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Murthy Bhat <Murthy.Bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_sas_transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_sas_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_sas_transport.c index b209a35e482ef..01dfb97b07786 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_sas_transport.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_sas_transport.c @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ static void pqi_free_sas_phy(struct pqi_sas_phy *pqi_sas_phy) struct sas_phy *phy = pqi_sas_phy->phy; sas_port_delete_phy(pqi_sas_phy->parent_port->port, phy); - sas_phy_free(phy); if (pqi_sas_phy->added_to_port) list_del(&pqi_sas_phy->phy_list_entry); + sas_phy_delete(phy); kfree(pqi_sas_phy); } -- 2.20.1
