Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] block: Introduce REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:42:12AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 17/04/2020 09:42, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Stupid question. At the end of this function I see:
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * If the host/device is unable to accept more work, inform the
> > 	 * caller of that.
> > 	 */
> > 	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
> > 		return false;
> > 
> > Why is BLK_STS_ZONE_RESOURCE missing?
> 
> Because technically the device can still accept more work, it is just 
> the zone-write lock for one (or more) zone(s) is locked. So we can still 
> try to dispatch work to the device, like reads or writes to other zones 
> in order to not starve any readers or writers to different zones.

Okay thanks for explaining.

As far as I can review it, it looks good. The code matches the commit message.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux