RE: [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On  Monday, January 08, 2007 3:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote:

> Right, I sort of suspected something like this.  BUSY/QUEUE_FULL
> handling was a bit iffy in 2.4; but it was sorted out in the 2003/4
> timeframe.  Nowadays, I think you want to translate the
> MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY directly to SAM_STAT_BUSY (i.e. just remove the
> special casing if).
> 

I think your'e on the same page with the folks from VMware,
where the've asked us to go back to our old driver code.
Meaning we kill the check for "MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY", instead the sam
status
is sent back "as is" without changing the DID_OK to DID_BUS_BUSY, etc. 

My problem with that is whether is breaks the Fibre Channel Folks. 
Will FC failover solution work properly if we go back to the old code?
I add Stephen Shirron and Mike Reed. 
I don't know.   Here is an explanation why that fix was needed back
about a year ago:


"When a target device responds with BUSY status, the MPT driver was
sending DID_OK to the 
SCSI mid layer, which caused the IO to be retried indefinitely between
the mid layer and the 
driver.  By changing the driver return status to DID_BUS_BUSY, the
target BUSY status can 
now flow through the mid layer to an upper layer Failover driver, which
will manage the I/O timeout."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux