On 04/14/2020 09:30 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-04-13 22:15, Mike Christie wrote:
>> @@ -537,8 +538,15 @@ void transport_deregister_session_configfs(struct se_session *se_sess)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_deregister_session_configfs);
>>
>> +
>
> A single blank line is probably sufficient here?
>
Yes. That was a cut and paste mistake when I was separating the code
into patches. Will fix.
>> void transport_free_session(struct se_session *se_sess)
>> {
>> + kobject_put(&se_sess->kobj);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_free_session);
>> +
>> +void __target_free_session(struct se_session *se_sess)
>> +{
>> struct se_node_acl *se_nacl = se_sess->se_node_acl;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -582,7 +590,6 @@ void transport_free_session(struct se_session *se_sess)
>> percpu_ref_exit(&se_sess->cmd_count);
>> kmem_cache_free(se_sess_cache, se_sess);
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_free_session);
>
> Does this patch defer execution of the code inside
> transport_free_session() from when transport_free_session() is called to
> when the last reference to a session is dropped? Can that have
Yes.
> unintended side effects? How about keeping most of the code that occurs
Yes. For example, we drop the refcount on the ACL in
__target_free_session so that is now not done until the last session
rerfcount is done. I did this because we reference the acl in a sysfs file.
> in transport_free_session() in that function and only freeing the memory
> associated with the session if the last reference is dropped?
>
I tried to minimize it already.
That is why I have the new session->fabric_free_cb in the next patch.
That way we do not need refcounts on structs like the tpg and can detach
that like normal in
transport_deregister_session/transport_deregister_session_configfs.
I will double check about what I can do about the ACL ref. We can do
things like copy the acl's name to the session, so we do not have to
reference the acl in sysfs.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
