> Il giorno 5 apr 2020, alle ore 16:00, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 2:15 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> OK, looks it isn't specific on BFQ any more.
>>
>> Follows another candidate approach for this issue, given it is so hard
>> to trigger, we can make it more reliable by rerun queue when has_work()
>> returns true after ops->dispath_request() returns NULL.
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> index 74cedea56034..4408e5d4fcd8 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_restart(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>> blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
>> }
>>
>> +#define BLK_MQ_BUDGET_DELAY 3 /* ms units */
>> /*
>> * Only SCSI implements .get_budget and .put_budget, and SCSI restarts
>> * its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
>> @@ -103,6 +104,9 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>> rq = e->type->ops.dispatch_request(hctx);
>> if (!rq) {
>> blk_mq_put_dispatch_budget(hctx);
>> +
>> + if (e->type->ops.has_work && e->type->ops.has_work(hctx))
>> + blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_BUDGET_DELAY);
>
> I agree that your patch should solve the race. With the current BFQ's
> has_work() it's a bit of a disaster though. It will essentially put
> blk-mq into a busy-wait loop (with a 3 ms delay between each poll)
> while BFQ's has_work() says "true" but BFQ doesn't dispatch anything.
>
> ...so I guess the question that still needs to be answered: does
> has_work() need to be exact? If so then we need the patch you propose
> plus one to BFQ. If not, we should continue along the lines of my
> patch.
>
Some more comments. BFQ's I/O plugging lasts 9 ms by default. So,
with this last Ming's patch, BFQ may happen to be polled every 3ms,
for at most three times.
On the opposite end, making bfq_has_work plugging aware costs more
complexity, and possibly one more lock. While avoiding the above
occasional polling, this may imply a lot of overhead or CPU stalls on
every dispatch.
Paolo
> -Doug
