Re: [RFC PATCH v1 27/50] drivers/s390/scsi/zcsp_fc.c: Use prandom_u32_max() for backoff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/31/20 6:13 PM, Benjamin Block wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:39:41PM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
We don't need crypto-grade random numbers for randomized backoffs.

(We could skip the if() if we wanted to rely on the undocumented fact
that prandom_u32_max(0) always returns 0.  That would be a net time
saving it port_scan_backoff == 0 is rare; if it's common, the if()
is false often enough to pay for itself. Not sure which applies here.)

Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <lkml@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hello George,

it would be nice, if you could address the mails to the
driver-maintainers (`scripts/get_maintainer.pl drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c`
will tell you that this is me and Steffen); I'd certainly have noticed
it earlier then :-).


diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
index b018b61bd168e..d24cafe02708f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ unsigned int zfcp_fc_port_scan_backoff(void)
  {
  	if (!port_scan_backoff)
  		return 0;
-	return get_random_int() % port_scan_backoff;
+	return prandom_u32_max(port_scan_backoff);

Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


I think the change is fine. You are right, we don't need a crypto nonce
here.

I think I'd let the zero-check stand as is, because the internal
behaviour of prandom_u32_max() is, as you say, undocumented. This is not
a performance critical code-path for us anyway.

yes, let's keep the extra check as it's intentional and documented user interface for zfcp, so better be explicit


  }
static void zfcp_fc_port_scan_time(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
--
2.26.0


Steffen, do you have any objections? Otherwise I can queue this up -
minus the somewhat mangled subject - for when we send something next time.



--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier

Linux on IBM Z Development

https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux