Re: [<RFC PATCH v2> 0/3] WriteBooster Feature Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/20/2020 5:48 PM, Asutosh Das wrote:
Still a RFC patch, because I'm still expecting some comments
on the design.

v1 -> v2:
- Addressed comments on v1

- Supports shared buffer mode only

- Didn't use exception event as suggested.
   The reason being while testing I saw that the WriteBooster
   available buffer remains at 0x1 for a longer time if flush is
   enabled all the time as compared to an event-based enablement.
   This essentially means that writes go to the WriteBooster buffer
   more. Spec says that the if flush is enabled, the device would
   flush when it sees the command queue empty. So I guess that'd trigger
   flush more than an event based approach.
   Anyway the Vcc would be turned-off during system suspend, so flush
   would stop anyway.
   In this patchset, I never turn-off flush.
   Hence the RFC.

Asutosh Das (3):
   scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support
   ufs-qcom: scsi: configure write booster type
   ufs: sysfs: add sysfs entries for write booster

  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c  |   7 ++
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c |  39 ++++++-
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h       |  37 ++++++-
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c    | 238 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h    |   9 ++
  5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


Hi,
Please ignore this patch, I'll send the proper series.


--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux