RE: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 0/1] Revert "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Avri
Do you want to revert all or two (scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data,   scsi: core: Introduce {init,exit}_cmd_priv() )?
Because the patches "scsi: ufs: Simplify two tests" and  "scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_init_lrb()" are ok to me.
No problem keeping them. Just this one "scsi: core: Introduce {init,exit}_cmd_priv()" is not necessary, since no drivers it now. 

//Bean


> 
> Hi,
> 
> >
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi, Martin
> >
> > Based on Bart's feedack, the less risky way is to revert commit:
> >
> > 34656dda81ac "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data"
> >
> > Bean Huo (1):
> >   Revert "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data"
> Maybe it's safer to revert the entire series?
> 
> Thanks,
> Avri
> 
> 
> >
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 198 ++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |   5 +
> >  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux