Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fc: Update Descriptor definition and add RDF and Link Integrity FPINs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/13/2020 2:00 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi James,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next linus/master v5.6-rc1 next-20200213]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/James-Smart/lpfc-Add-Link-Integrity-FPIN-registration-and-logging/20200213-051448
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next
config: i386-randconfig-g002-20200213 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.5.0-4) 7.5.0
reproduce:
         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
         make ARCH=i386

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

    In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
    ./usr/include/scsi/fc/fc_els.h: In function 'fc_tlv_next_desc':
./usr/include/scsi/fc/fc_els.h:274:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'be32_to_cpu'; did you mean '__be32_to_cpu'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       (be32_to_cpu((tlv)->desc_len) + FC_TLV_DESC_HDR_SZ)
        ^
./usr/include/scsi/fc/fc_els.h:286:17: note: in expansion of macro 'FC_TLV_DESC_SZ_FROM_LENGTH'
      return (desc + FC_TLV_DESC_SZ_FROM_LENGTH(tlv));
                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Can you tell me what it was that was built that failed.
This should have been addressed by the "#include <asm/byteorder.h>" at the top of the header.

I'm suspecting it's a non-kernel entity, so the header didn't resolve as it should (perhaps the suggestion should be used instead).

-- james




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux