Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Inline Encryption Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:53:41PM -0800, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> So I tried reading through more of blk-mq and the IO schedulers to figure
> out how to do this. As far as I can tell, requests may be merged with
> each other until they're taken off the scheduler. So ideally, we'd
> program a keyslot for a request when it's taken off the scheduler, but
> this happens from within an atomic context. Otoh, programming a keyslot
> might cause the thread to sleep (in the event that all keyslots are in use
> by other in-flight requests). Unless I'm missing something, or you had some
> other different idea in mind, I think it's a lot easier to stick to letting
> blk-crypto program keyslots and manage them per-bio...

But as far as I understand from reading the code it only sleeps because
it waits for another key slot to be released.  Which is exactly like
any other resource constraint in the storage device.  In that case
->queue_rq returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE (or you do the equivalent in the
blk-mq code) and the queue gets woken again once the resource is
available.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux