[PATCH 06/12] lpfc: Fix compiler warning on frame size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The following error is see from the compiler:

  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function
    ‘lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq’: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:12660:1:
      error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
         [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]

The issue is due to allocating a cpumask on the stack.

Fix by converting to a dynamical allocation of the cpu mask.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 9fd238d49117..9a6191818a23 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -11106,15 +11106,19 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors)
  * @cpu:    cpu going offline
  * @eqlist:
  */
-static void
+static int
 lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, unsigned int cpu,
 		  struct list_head *eqlist)
 {
 	const struct cpumask *maskp;
 	struct lpfc_queue *eq;
-	cpumask_t tmp;
+	struct cpumask *tmp;
 	u16 idx;
 
+	tmp = kzalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tmp)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	for (idx = 0; idx < phba->cfg_irq_chann; idx++) {
 		maskp = pci_irq_get_affinity(phba->pcidev, idx);
 		if (!maskp)
@@ -11124,7 +11128,7 @@ lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, unsigned int cpu,
 		 * then we don't need to poll the eq attached
 		 * to it.
 		 */
-		if (!cpumask_and(&tmp, maskp, cpumask_of(cpu)))
+		if (!cpumask_and(tmp, maskp, cpumask_of(cpu)))
 			continue;
 		/* get the cpus that are online and are affini-
 		 * tized to this irq vector.  If the count is
@@ -11132,8 +11136,8 @@ lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, unsigned int cpu,
 		 * down this vector.  Since this cpu has not
 		 * gone offline yet, we need >1.
 		 */
-		cpumask_and(&tmp, maskp, cpu_online_mask);
-		if (cpumask_weight(&tmp) > 1)
+		cpumask_and(tmp, maskp, cpu_online_mask);
+		if (cpumask_weight(tmp) > 1)
 			continue;
 
 		/* Now that we have an irq to shutdown, get the eq
@@ -11144,6 +11148,8 @@ lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, unsigned int cpu,
 		eq = phba->sli4_hba.hba_eq_hdl[idx].eq;
 		list_add(&eq->_poll_list, eqlist);
 	}
+	kfree(tmp);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __lpfc_cpuhp_remove(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
@@ -11314,7 +11320,9 @@ static int lpfc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 
 	lpfc_irq_rebalance(phba, cpu, true);
 
-	lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(phba, cpu, &eqlist);
+	retval = lpfc_cpuhp_get_eq(phba, cpu, &eqlist);
+	if (retval)
+		return retval;
 
 	/* start polling on these eq's */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(eq, next, &eqlist, _poll_list) {
-- 
2.13.7




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux