Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: qla2xxx: use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to simplify code

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 2020-01-22 02:18, Chen Zhou wrote:
> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO contains if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR, just use 
> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> index abe7f79..719d53d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> @@ -1462,10 +1462,8 @@ static int tcm_qla2xxx_check_initiator_node_acl(
>  				       sizeof(struct qla_tgt_cmd),
>  				       TARGET_PROT_ALL, port_name,
>  				       qlat_sess, tcm_qla2xxx_session_cb);
> -	if (IS_ERR(se_sess))
> -		return PTR_ERR(se_sess);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(se_sess);
>  }

Is this a useful change? My personal opinion is that the current
implementation (without this patch) is easier to read.

Thanks,

Bart.