On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:04:20PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 17:10 +0000, John Garry wrote: > > On 08/01/2020 16:08, John Garry wrote: > > > On 08/01/2020 16:01, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > > cdev->dev = NULL; > > > > > > > return device_add(&cdev->cdev); > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > The design of the code is simply to remove the link to the > > > > > > inserted device which has been removed. > > > > > > > > > > > > I*think* this means the calls to device_del and device_add > > > > > > are unnecessary and should go. enclosure_remove_links and > > > > > > the put of the enclosed device should be sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > That would make more sense than trying to "reuse" the device > > > > > structure here by tearing it down and adding it back. > > > > > > > > OK, let's try that. This should be the patch if someone can try > > > > it (I've compile tested it, but the enclosure system is under a > > > > heap of stuff in the garage). > > > > > > I can test it now. > > > > > > > Yeah, that looks to have worked ok. SES disk locate was also fine > > after losing and rediscovering the disk. > > OK, I'll spin up a patch with fixes/reported and tested tags. Did this get sent? I can't seem to find it :(
