Re: [PATCH 4/6] ufs: Fix a race condition in the tracing code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-12-25 06:02, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Starting execution of a command before tracing a command may cause the
completion handler to free data while it is being traced. Fix this race
by tracing a command before it is submitted.

Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 80b028ba39e9..4d9bb1932b39 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1875,12 +1875,12 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba,
unsigned int task_tag)
 {
 	hba->lrb[task_tag].issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
 	hba->lrb[task_tag].compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
+	ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, "send");

How about moving it after __set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);?

Thanks,

Can Guo.

 	ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
 	__set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << task_tag, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
 	/* Make sure that doorbell is committed immediately */
 	wmb();
-	ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, "send");
 }

 /**



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux