Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-12-17 02:05, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:31:29PM +0800, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2019-12-15 02:32, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/14/19 8:03 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> > In ufshcd_remove(), after SCSI host is removed, put it once so that
> > its
> > resources can be released.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index b5966fa..a86b0fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -8251,6 +8251,7 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> >   	ufs_bsg_remove(hba);
> >   	ufs_sysfs_remove_nodes(hba->dev);
> >   	scsi_remove_host(hba->host);
> > +	scsi_host_put(hba->host);
> >   	/* disable interrupts */
> >   	ufshcd_disable_intr(hba, hba->intr_mask);
> >   	ufshcd_hba_stop(hba, true);
>
> Hi Can,
>
> The UFS driver may queue work asynchronously and that asynchronous
> work may refer to the SCSI host, e.g. ufshcd_err_handler(). Is it
> guaranteed that all that asynchronous work has finished before
> scsi_host_put() is called?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.

Hi Bart,

As SCSI host is allocated in ufshcd_platform_init() during platform
drive probe, it is much more appropriate if platform driver calls
ufshcd_dealloc_host() in their own drv->remove() path. How do you
think if I change it as below? If it is OK to you, please ignore my
previous mails.

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device
*pdev)

        pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
        ufshcd_remove(hba);
+       ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
        return 0;
 }

Wait, why is this a platform device?  Don't you hang off of a pci
device?  Or am I missing something earlier in this patchset?

thanks,

greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I am not saying someone is a platform device here. My point is
whoever allocates the SCSI host in its drv->probe(), should
de-allocate it in its own drv->remove(), just like what ufshcd-pci.c
does.

Thanks,

Can Guo.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux