Re: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ewan,

> Delaying the queue re-run vs. a ramp down might negatively affect
> performance.  I'm not sure how accurate the ramp is at discovering the
> optimum though.

The optimum - as well as the actual limit - might change over time in a
multi-initiator setup as other hosts grab resources on the device.

I do think that the only way forward here, if we want to avoid counting
outstanding commands for performance reasons, is to ensure that the
BUSY/QUEUE_FULL/TASK_SET_FULL handling is relatively fast path and not
something deep in the bowels of error handling. Which it actually
isn't. But I do think we'll need to take a closer look.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux