On 11/13/19 8:03 AM, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
I think, you are asking for comment from Can. As for me, attached patch is better.
Removing ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(), instead of reading doorbell register, Now
using block layer blk_mq_{un,}freeze_queue(), looks good. I tested your V5 patches,
didn't find problem yet.
Since my available platform doesn't support dynamic clk scaling, I think, now seems only
Qcom UFS controllers support this feature. So we need Can Guo to finally confirm it.
Hi Can,
Do you agree with this patch series if patch 4 is replaced by the patch
attached to my previous e-mail? The entire (revised) series is available
at https://github.com/bvanassche/linux/tree/ufs-for-next.
Thanks,
Bart.
