[PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>

Avoid an uninitialized value (0) for ha->fc4_type_priority being falsely
interpreted as NVMe priority. Not strictly needed any more after the
previous patch, but makes the fc4_type_priority handling more explicit.

Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: David Bond <dbond@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Himanshu Madhani <hmadhani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h    | 6 ++++--
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_inline.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
index 721ee7f..86c5155 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
@@ -2476,8 +2476,10 @@ typedef struct fc_port {
 	u16 n2n_chip_reset;
 } fc_port_t;
 
-#define FC4_PRIORITY_NVME	0
-#define FC4_PRIORITY_FCP	1
+enum {
+	FC4_PRIORITY_NVME = 1,
+	FC4_PRIORITY_FCP  = 2,
+};
 
 #define QLA_FCPORT_SCAN		1
 #define QLA_FCPORT_FOUND	2
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_inline.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_inline.h
index d728b17..352aba4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_inline.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_inline.h
@@ -317,5 +317,5 @@ qla2xxx_get_fc4_priority(struct scsi_qla_host *vha)
 	    ((uint8_t *)vha->hw->nvram)[NVRAM_DUAL_FCP_NVME_FLAG_OFFSET];
 
 
-	return ((data >> 6) & BIT_0);
+	return (data >> 6) & BIT_0 ? FC4_PRIORITY_FCP : FC4_PRIORITY_NVME;
 }
-- 
2.23.0




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux