Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] ufs: Use reserved tags for TMFs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:42:23PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Reserved tags are numerically lower than non-reserved tags. Compensate the
> change caused by reserving tags by subtracting the number of reserved tags
> from the tag number assigned by the block layer.

Why would you do that?  Do we really care about the exact tag number?
If so would it make sense to reverse in the block layer how we allocate
private vs normal tags?

Also this change should probably merged into the patch that actually
starts using the private tags by actually allocating requests using
them.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux