Re: [PATCH 16/52] dc395: drop private SAM status code definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/52] dc395: drop private SAM status code definitions
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:42:44 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, James Bottomley <james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191104090151.129140-17-hare@suse.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 11/4/19 1:01 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

We don't need to duplicate definitions from the common include

files.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCHv3 00/52] Revamp SCSI result values
  - From: Hannes Reinecke
- [PATCH 16/52] dc395: drop private SAM status code definitions
  - From: Hannes Reinecke

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/52] nsp_cs: use standard SAM status codes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 17/52] qla4xxx: use standard SAM status definitions
Previous by thread: [PATCH 16/52] dc395: drop private SAM status code definitions
Next by thread: [PATCH 20/52] sg: use SAM status definitions and avoid using masked_status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux