Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: Fix scsi_get/set_resid() interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/19 9:21 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> If you feel strongly about it, I have absolutely no problem with
> dropping the patch. I just would like that it be dropped for the right
> reasons...

Hi Damien,

What I'm wondering about is how the SCSI core should support residual
overflow. Should a new member be introduced in struct scsi_request?
Should resid_len be changed from unsigned int to int or should we
perhaps follow yet another approach?

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux