On 10/30/19 9:21 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote: > If you feel strongly about it, I have absolutely no problem with > dropping the patch. I just would like that it be dropped for the right > reasons... Hi Damien, What I'm wondering about is how the SCSI core should support residual overflow. Should a new member be introduced in struct scsi_request? Should resid_len be changed from unsigned int to int or should we perhaps follow yet another approach? Thanks, Bart.
