Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Honor module parameter lpfc_use_adisc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2019 3:05 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
The initial lpfc_desc_set_adisc implementation dea3101e0a5c ("lpfc:
add Emulex FC driver version 8.0.28") enabled ADISC if

	cfg_use_adisc && RSCN_MODE && FCP_2_DEVICE

In commit 92d7f7b0cde3 ("[SCSI] lpfc: NPIV: add NPIV support on top of
SLI-3") this changed to

	(cfg_use_adisc && RSC_MODE) || FCP_2_DEVICE

and later in ffc954936b13 ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.13: FC Discovery Fixes and
enhancements.") to

	(cfg_use_adisc && RSC_MODE) || (FCP_2_DEVICe && FCP_TARGET)

A customer reports that after a Devlos, an ADISC failure is logged. It
turns out the ADISC flag is set even the user explicitly set
lpfc_use_adisc = 0.

[Sat Dec 22 22:55:58 2018] lpfc 0000:82:00.0: 2:(0):0203 Devloss timeout on WWPN 50:01:43:80:12:8e:40:20 NPort x05df00 Data: x82000000 x8 xa
[Sat Dec 22 23:08:20 2018] lpfc 0000:82:00.0: 2:(0):2755 ADISC failure DID:05DF00 Status:x9/x70000

Fixes: 92d7f7b0cde3 ("[SCSI] lpfc: NPIV: add NPIV support on top of SLI-3")
Cc: James Smart <James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
---
Hi,

Unfortunatly, I don't really know all the procotols involved. So this
is just a rough guess what is wrong.

Thanks,
Daniel

  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
index cc6b1b0bae83..d27ae84326df 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
@@ -940,9 +940,9 @@ lpfc_disc_set_adisc(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp)
if (!(vport->fc_flag & FC_PT2PT)) {
  		/* Check config parameter use-adisc or FCP-2 */
-		if ((vport->cfg_use_adisc && (vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE)) ||
+		if (vport->cfg_use_adisc && ((vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE) ||
  		    ((ndlp->nlp_fcp_info & NLP_FCP_2_DEVICE) &&
-		     (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET))) {
+		     (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET)))) {
  			spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
  			ndlp->nlp_flag |= NLP_NPR_ADISC;
  			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank You

-- james




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux