Re: [RFC] Re: broken userland ABI in configfs binary attributes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:28:19PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> For configfs bin_attr it won't work, simply because it wants the entire
> thing to be present - callback parses the data.  For SCSI tape...  Maybe,
> but you'll need to take care of the overlaps with ->write().  Right now
> it can't happen (the last reference, about to be dropped right after
> st_flush() returns); if we do that on each ->flush(), we will have to
> cope with that fun and we'll need to keep an error (if any) for the
> next call of st_flush() to pick and return.  I'm not saying it can't
> be done, but that's really a question for SCSI folks.

So for the one real life example of the configfs attribute life
actually is simpler.  acpi_table_aml_write verifies early on that
the size matches what it expects.  So if we document that any future
instance needs to be able to do that as well we should be able to
get away with just writing it from ->flush.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux