[PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: target/tcm_loop: ignore already deleted scsi device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If there is no corresponding scsi_device for a LUN,
tcm_loop_port_unlink() complains that it "Unable to locate struct
scsi_device for " the device and keep %tl_tpg_port_count as is. However,
such situation is legal when we delete a SCSI device using
/sys/class/scsi_device/${lun}/device/delete. We can safely ignore the
missing SCSI device case here.

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
index 3305b47fdf53..0942f3bd7eec 100644
--- a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
+++ b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
@@ -654,16 +654,16 @@ static void tcm_loop_port_unlink(
 
 	sd = scsi_device_lookup(tl_hba->sh, 0, tl_tpg->tl_tpgt,
 				se_lun->unpacked_lun);
-	if (!sd) {
-		pr_err("Unable to locate struct scsi_device for %d:%d:%llu\n",
-		       0, tl_tpg->tl_tpgt, se_lun->unpacked_lun);
-		return;
+	if (sd) {
+		/*
+		 * Remove Linux/SCSI struct scsi_device by HCTL
+		 */
+		scsi_remove_device(sd);
+		scsi_device_put(sd);
+	} else {
+		pr_debug("Unable to locate struct scsi_device for %d:%d:%llu\n",
+			 0, tl_tpg->tl_tpgt, se_lun->unpacked_lun);
 	}
-	/*
-	 * Remove Linux/SCSI struct scsi_device by HCTL
-	 */
-	scsi_remove_device(sd);
-	scsi_device_put(sd);
 
 	atomic_dec_mb(&tl_tpg->tl_tpg_port_count);
 
-- 
2.23.0




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux