Re: [PATCH 05/19] sg: replace rq array with lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Douglas,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.3-rc1 next-20190723]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Gilbert/sg-v4-interface-rq-sharing-multiple-rqs/20190525-161346
base:   https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-rc1-7-g2b96cd8-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2808:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@    expected int gfp @@    got restricted gfp_t [usertyint gfp @@
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2808:20: sparse:    expected int gfp
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2808:20: sparse:    got restricted gfp_t [usertype]
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2811:51: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2811:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@    expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags @@    got  [usertype] flags @@
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2811:49: sparse:    expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags
>> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2811:49: sparse:    got unsigned int
   drivers/scsi/sg.c:2813:51: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer
   drivers/scsi/sg.c:2813:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@    expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags @@    got  [usertype] flags @@
   drivers/scsi/sg.c:2813:49: sparse:    expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags
   drivers/scsi/sg.c:2813:49: sparse:    got unsigned int
   include/linux/spinlock.h:393:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'sg_add_request' - different lock contexts for basic block

vim +2808 drivers/scsi/sg.c

  2797	
  2798	/*
  2799	 * Makes a new sg_request object. If 'first' is set then use GFP_KERNEL which
  2800	 * may take time but has improved chance of success, otherwise use GFP_ATOMIC.
  2801	 * Note that basic initialization is done but srp is not added to either sfp
  2802	 * list. On error returns twisted negated errno value (not NULL).
  2803	 */
  2804	static struct sg_request *
  2805	sg_mk_srp(struct sg_fd *sfp, bool first)
  2806	{
  2807		struct sg_request *srp;
> 2808		int gfp =  __GFP_NOWARN;
  2809	
  2810		if (first)      /* prepared to wait if none already outstanding */
> 2811			srp = kzalloc(sizeof(*srp), gfp | GFP_KERNEL);
  2812		else
  2813			srp = kzalloc(sizeof(*srp), gfp | GFP_ATOMIC);
  2814		if (srp) {
  2815			spin_lock_init(&srp->req_lck);
  2816			atomic_set(&srp->rq_st, SG_RS_INACTIVE);
  2817			srp->parentfp = sfp;
  2818			return srp;
  2819		} else {
  2820			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
  2821		}
  2822	}
  2823	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux