On 19-07-15 08:13:36, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > I think this is fundamentally wrong. > ABORT_TASK is used to abort a single task, which of course has to be > known beforehand. If you don't know the task, what exactly do you hope > to achieve here? Aborting random I/O? > Or, even worse, aborting I/O the driver uses internally and corrupt the > internal workflow of the driver? > > We should simply disallow any ABORT TASK from userspace if the TaskMID > is zero. And I would even argue to disabllow ABORT TASK from userspace > completely, as the smid is never relayed to userland, and as such the > user cannot know which task should be aborted. > > Cheers, > > Hannes Sreekanth, Could you please give some thoughts about what Hannes said?
