Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: add zone open, close and finish support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/21/19 6:07 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 95202f80676c..067ef9242275 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -284,13 +284,20 @@ enum req_opf {
  	REQ_OP_DISCARD		= 3,
  	/* securely erase sectors */
  	REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE	= 5,
-	/* reset a zone write pointer */
-	REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET	= 6,
  	/* write the same sector many times */
  	REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME	= 7,
  	/* write the zero filled sector many times */
  	REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES	= 9,
+ /* reset a zone write pointer */
+	REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET	= 16,
+	/* Open zone(s) */
+	REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN	= 17,
+	/* Close zone(s) */
+	REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE	= 18,
+	/* Finish zone(s) */
+	REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH	= 19,
+
  	/* SCSI passthrough using struct scsi_request */
  	REQ_OP_SCSI_IN		= 32,
  	REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT		= 33,
@@ -375,6 +382,22 @@ static inline void bio_set_op_attrs(struct bio *bio, unsigned op,
  	bio->bi_opf = op | op_flags;
  }

Are the new operation types ever passed to op_is_write()? The definition of that function is as follows:

static inline bool op_is_write(unsigned int op)
{
	return (op & 1);
}



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux